<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Biopace Chainrings</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.chuffle.com/20070620/biopace-chainrings/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.chuffle.com/20070620/biopace-chainrings</link>
	<description>Mostly cursewords and ad hominem attacks on technology</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 05 Jun 2010 21:36:32 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Eric</title>
		<link>http://www.chuffle.com/20070620/biopace-chainrings/comment-page-1#comment-11485</link>
		<dc:creator>Eric</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Jun 2010 02:19:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chuffle.com/20070620/biopace-chainrings/#comment-11485</guid>
		<description>I have an old Gary Fisher that some previous owner converted to biopace cranksets in some far off past.  I got the bike used, and never even noticed that it was equipped with what I had always thought of as a stupid gimmick.  I have psoriatic arthritis, and it has effected my knees, so I am very sensitive to anything that puts undue stress on these joints.  I&#039;m not defending the biopace, as I don&#039;t have enough knowledge to have anything more than an opinion. However, the first week owning this bike, and riding it up and down hills (paved roads), my knees felt great.  I was powering my way up hills with relative ease, and no howling pain in my knees the next morning.  It was noticeably more comfortable and easier to ride than my Trek, even with comparable size chain rings.  When I finally got around to tearing down the bike to repack the bottom bracket and change the cables, I noticed it was equipped with a biopace crankset.  I&#039;ll be damned. Maybe the science behind the biopace is valid, maybe it&#039;s crap.  But, at least for me, the damn thing works as Shimano claimed.  And I know full well that, if I had known it was a biopace crankset at the time I got the bike, I would have sworn up and down that it caused me endless pain, and I would have changed it.  The main disadvantage I can possibly see at this point is the possibility that the front derailuer will be a bitch to adjust properly when the time comes.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have an old Gary Fisher that some previous owner converted to biopace cranksets in some far off past.  I got the bike used, and never even noticed that it was equipped with what I had always thought of as a stupid gimmick.  I have psoriatic arthritis, and it has effected my knees, so I am very sensitive to anything that puts undue stress on these joints.  I&#8217;m not defending the biopace, as I don&#8217;t have enough knowledge to have anything more than an opinion. However, the first week owning this bike, and riding it up and down hills (paved roads), my knees felt great.  I was powering my way up hills with relative ease, and no howling pain in my knees the next morning.  It was noticeably more comfortable and easier to ride than my Trek, even with comparable size chain rings.  When I finally got around to tearing down the bike to repack the bottom bracket and change the cables, I noticed it was equipped with a biopace crankset.  I&#8217;ll be damned. Maybe the science behind the biopace is valid, maybe it&#8217;s crap.  But, at least for me, the damn thing works as Shimano claimed.  And I know full well that, if I had known it was a biopace crankset at the time I got the bike, I would have sworn up and down that it caused me endless pain, and I would have changed it.  The main disadvantage I can possibly see at this point is the possibility that the front derailuer will be a bitch to adjust properly when the time comes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: What the ?</title>
		<link>http://www.chuffle.com/20070620/biopace-chainrings/comment-page-1#comment-11482</link>
		<dc:creator>What the ?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 May 2010 19:36:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chuffle.com/20070620/biopace-chainrings/#comment-11482</guid>
		<description>I have ridden both biopace and round chainrings on mountain, road, single speed and road bikes. After tens of thousands of miles of riding, I have reached the following personal conclusions: Biopace cranks are great for slow trail riding and loaded touring applications; Round rings are best for faster cadence road or mountain racing applications. These are my opinions  so take &#039;em or leave &#039;em. I have heard more than my share of strong opinions from young, attention seeking, smart ass punks. 

Moral: Don&#039;t follow someone unless you are sure they know what they are talking about. Be thoughtful, respectful, and open-minded. Then make up your own mind.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have ridden both biopace and round chainrings on mountain, road, single speed and road bikes. After tens of thousands of miles of riding, I have reached the following personal conclusions: Biopace cranks are great for slow trail riding and loaded touring applications; Round rings are best for faster cadence road or mountain racing applications. These are my opinions  so take &#8216;em or leave &#8216;em. I have heard more than my share of strong opinions from young, attention seeking, smart ass punks. </p>
<p>Moral: Don&#8217;t follow someone unless you are sure they know what they are talking about. Be thoughtful, respectful, and open-minded. Then make up your own mind.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave</title>
		<link>http://www.chuffle.com/20070620/biopace-chainrings/comment-page-1#comment-11331</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 May 2010 20:24:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chuffle.com/20070620/biopace-chainrings/#comment-11331</guid>
		<description>Hi all.  I found this discussion via a google search for Biopace.  I am rebuilding an 80&#039;s vintage mountain bike for street use.  My plan is for using Biopace rings on it.  I have bad knees due to a genetic defect and I hope that this will help.

My opinion on round versus eliptical chainrings is simply &quot;Use whatever works best for you&quot;.  I know a bit about ergonomics and that methodology is pretty much my mantra.  Shoot, someday I&#039;m going to build a bike with a microshift grip shifter for the front and a trigger shifter for the rear.  Why?  Because I think that it would work better for me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi all.  I found this discussion via a google search for Biopace.  I am rebuilding an 80&#8217;s vintage mountain bike for street use.  My plan is for using Biopace rings on it.  I have bad knees due to a genetic defect and I hope that this will help.</p>
<p>My opinion on round versus eliptical chainrings is simply &#8220;Use whatever works best for you&#8221;.  I know a bit about ergonomics and that methodology is pretty much my mantra.  Shoot, someday I&#8217;m going to build a bike with a microshift grip shifter for the front and a trigger shifter for the rear.  Why?  Because I think that it would work better for me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bicycler</title>
		<link>http://www.chuffle.com/20070620/biopace-chainrings/comment-page-1#comment-11162</link>
		<dc:creator>bicycler</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Apr 2010 22:18:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chuffle.com/20070620/biopace-chainrings/#comment-11162</guid>
		<description>I would hazard a guess that the legal department at Shimano killed it due to liability issues.....of course that means there could be nothing wrong with it at all.  Just the possibility of getting sued....

I plan to build a single speed/fixed gear training/commuting bike with some NOS biopace and try it out myself....I hope it will help me better balance climbing ability and gearing for speed.

I read Sheldons&#039; experiences, and learned from them, and will try it for myself.  I learned nothing from the asshat Jarvitron.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would hazard a guess that the legal department at Shimano killed it due to liability issues&#8230;..of course that means there could be nothing wrong with it at all.  Just the possibility of getting sued&#8230;.</p>
<p>I plan to build a single speed/fixed gear training/commuting bike with some NOS biopace and try it out myself&#8230;.I hope it will help me better balance climbing ability and gearing for speed.</p>
<p>I read Sheldons&#8217; experiences, and learned from them, and will try it for myself.  I learned nothing from the asshat Jarvitron.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ian</title>
		<link>http://www.chuffle.com/20070620/biopace-chainrings/comment-page-1#comment-10782</link>
		<dc:creator>Ian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Mar 2010 02:46:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chuffle.com/20070620/biopace-chainrings/#comment-10782</guid>
		<description>I just discovered I am  using biopace rings. I never noticed them. I looked up the net to see what they were and presto. Sad to see people taking this so seriously. My guess though is that if they worked they&#039;d still be around. All the money spent on being 1/100th of a second faster should have meant they&#039;d still be around if they made any difference. At the moment I like mine more because they&#039;re different :P

Peace and love... and if you don&#039;t like peace and love, then you just need more of it!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just discovered I am  using biopace rings. I never noticed them. I looked up the net to see what they were and presto. Sad to see people taking this so seriously. My guess though is that if they worked they&#8217;d still be around. All the money spent on being 1/100th of a second faster should have meant they&#8217;d still be around if they made any difference. At the moment I like mine more because they&#8217;re different :P</p>
<p>Peace and love&#8230; and if you don&#8217;t like peace and love, then you just need more of it!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael</title>
		<link>http://www.chuffle.com/20070620/biopace-chainrings/comment-page-1#comment-10749</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Mar 2010 15:35:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chuffle.com/20070620/biopace-chainrings/#comment-10749</guid>
		<description>Oh. Just because the Concorde (the worlds first supersonic jetliner) was taken out of service in the end does not mean it was a &#039;shit&#039; design, or poorly researched.

It was novel, interesting, conceptually daring. Commercially it was not quite what it could have been or what the designers might have expected - in thanks to a numerous small and some larger accidents causing the final demise of the &#039;first and only&#039; supersonic jetliner. 

I cannot say for sure if biopace was properly researched and tested - but it&#039;s line of thought is not completely nonsensical. There are many mechanical and bio-mechanical ways of motion that use a biopace-like transfer of energy (in many many applications).

Right. Eh. That was it. Concorde, Biopace. And all.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh. Just because the Concorde (the worlds first supersonic jetliner) was taken out of service in the end does not mean it was a &#8217;shit&#8217; design, or poorly researched.</p>
<p>It was novel, interesting, conceptually daring. Commercially it was not quite what it could have been or what the designers might have expected &#8211; in thanks to a numerous small and some larger accidents causing the final demise of the &#8216;first and only&#8217; supersonic jetliner. </p>
<p>I cannot say for sure if biopace was properly researched and tested &#8211; but it&#8217;s line of thought is not completely nonsensical. There are many mechanical and bio-mechanical ways of motion that use a biopace-like transfer of energy (in many many applications).</p>
<p>Right. Eh. That was it. Concorde, Biopace. And all.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael</title>
		<link>http://www.chuffle.com/20070620/biopace-chainrings/comment-page-1#comment-10748</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Mar 2010 15:29:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chuffle.com/20070620/biopace-chainrings/#comment-10748</guid>
		<description>I have only used Biopace a couple of times - my brother had it on his bike. I did not notice much of it, except for a positive change in up-hill performance or the first bit of a sprint. After that felt very similar to regular&#039;s. 

I do have severe knee problems now - 14 years later - but I doubt they are the issue of a few days of biopace. Riding overweighed, oversized bikes for years in my youth or just a stupid wrong step during house-moving might have.

I found Jarvitron&#039;s initial posting quite well done - I do appreciate a diss with humour. The responses were pretty good as well, pro&#039;s and con&#039;s all over the place.

I dont quite understand what frustrated 10-year old took over his account and starting posting the low grade nonsense and swearing. But hey, perhaps the initial posting was a lot more serious than I thought.

Jarv, take it easy. Take a rest. Enjoy the discussion, contribute a bit - or if you dont have anything to contribute, just ignore us. You started this crap, live with it ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have only used Biopace a couple of times &#8211; my brother had it on his bike. I did not notice much of it, except for a positive change in up-hill performance or the first bit of a sprint. After that felt very similar to regular&#8217;s. </p>
<p>I do have severe knee problems now &#8211; 14 years later &#8211; but I doubt they are the issue of a few days of biopace. Riding overweighed, oversized bikes for years in my youth or just a stupid wrong step during house-moving might have.</p>
<p>I found Jarvitron&#8217;s initial posting quite well done &#8211; I do appreciate a diss with humour. The responses were pretty good as well, pro&#8217;s and con&#8217;s all over the place.</p>
<p>I dont quite understand what frustrated 10-year old took over his account and starting posting the low grade nonsense and swearing. But hey, perhaps the initial posting was a lot more serious than I thought.</p>
<p>Jarv, take it easy. Take a rest. Enjoy the discussion, contribute a bit &#8211; or if you dont have anything to contribute, just ignore us. You started this crap, live with it ;)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Critical MX</title>
		<link>http://www.chuffle.com/20070620/biopace-chainrings/comment-page-1#comment-10568</link>
		<dc:creator>Critical MX</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Feb 2010 02:29:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chuffle.com/20070620/biopace-chainrings/#comment-10568</guid>
		<description>As I read through the blog everyone states their own line of bullshit about Biopace. Yep, I own a set and have some roundies too. The fact is that NO ONE in this blogs brings to bear any scientific test on the Biopace. All we here is individual feel and taste crap. How about getting a hold of some MIT boston biker and have him do a true mechanical test and stats analysis. Not a hard deal but requires a force meter and some mechanical setup. Run the damned test and check out the force curves through the rotation under various conditions and we&#039;ll have the answer...then someone will lokk fucking stupid and some will look brilliant.

Dread Pirate..dead on about the Gasbag...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As I read through the blog everyone states their own line of bullshit about Biopace. Yep, I own a set and have some roundies too. The fact is that NO ONE in this blogs brings to bear any scientific test on the Biopace. All we here is individual feel and taste crap. How about getting a hold of some MIT boston biker and have him do a true mechanical test and stats analysis. Not a hard deal but requires a force meter and some mechanical setup. Run the damned test and check out the force curves through the rotation under various conditions and we&#8217;ll have the answer&#8230;then someone will lokk fucking stupid and some will look brilliant.</p>
<p>Dread Pirate..dead on about the Gasbag&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Dread Pirate Neck Beard</title>
		<link>http://www.chuffle.com/20070620/biopace-chainrings/comment-page-1#comment-10503</link>
		<dc:creator>The Dread Pirate Neck Beard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Feb 2010 19:16:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chuffle.com/20070620/biopace-chainrings/#comment-10503</guid>
		<description>Biopace makes people insufferable gasbags?  Who knew?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Biopace makes people insufferable gasbags?  Who knew?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: barefoot</title>
		<link>http://www.chuffle.com/20070620/biopace-chainrings/comment-page-1#comment-10135</link>
		<dc:creator>barefoot</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Jan 2010 22:34:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chuffle.com/20070620/biopace-chainrings/#comment-10135</guid>
		<description>Apologies for rousing this ancient post again (and risking more four-lettered insults from the strangely abusive author). I stumbled here after searching for &quot;biopace knee&quot;.

I did my first ever 100-mile ride 3 days ago. Solo, and with about 20 miles of harsh dirt road in the middle. My taint is recovering, but my right knee is still a bit whacked. Yes, my touring bike has Biopace rings - I built it up not long ago using parts off a nice barn-find &#039;80s road bike that didn&#039;t fit me. Most of my riding (over the last 20 years or so) has been on mountain bikes with round rings.

So, I&#039;m not sure whether my knee is tweaked because I rode further than I&#039;m used to, because I was too lazy to spin properly for the last 30 miles, because my cleat position was a bit off, because my shoes are too flexible and a tad too small, because I have genetically bad knees, or because of the evils of Biopace. All of these are likely contributing factors.

I&#039;m a Biopace agnostic.

What I take exception to is your assessment of the Titanic. Having written a thesis on the damaged stability of ships for my Naval Architecture degree (albeit some 15 years ago), I&#039;m better qualified in this field than I am in egg-shaped chain rings.

The Titanic was the first ship designed to even consider surviving a ruptured hull. Prior to that, it was a certainty - if you put a hole in the side, the ship was going to the bottom of the ocean unless you could pump the water out faster than it came in.

The Titanic raised the bar, and introduced the design philosophy that is still in use today. They divided the hull into watertight compartments, such that the ship would stay afloat with any _two_ compartments punctured. A quantum leap in thinking.

&quot;Unsinkable&quot; was all puff. Made up by the marketeering department, for use by the magazine editors of the day. It would certainly sink if three compartments flooded. They holed five (or six, depending on source).

Nearly 100 years later, we understand the fracture mechanics of cold steel better, and we&#039;re better able to calculate the survivability of damaged vessels. So we do. 

Current design rules take into account the stability of every possible flooding combination and the probability of damage causing that damage state. Compartments are optimised based on these results. If they had attempted such calculations (by hand) when designing Titanic, they&#039;d still be working today.

Titanic sank because it hit an iceberg, not because it was a badly designed vessel. Any other ship afloat at the time would have sunk. It was the safest ship of its day, and it insults the designers to compare it with Biopace chainrings.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Apologies for rousing this ancient post again (and risking more four-lettered insults from the strangely abusive author). I stumbled here after searching for &#8220;biopace knee&#8221;.</p>
<p>I did my first ever 100-mile ride 3 days ago. Solo, and with about 20 miles of harsh dirt road in the middle. My taint is recovering, but my right knee is still a bit whacked. Yes, my touring bike has Biopace rings &#8211; I built it up not long ago using parts off a nice barn-find &#8217;80s road bike that didn&#8217;t fit me. Most of my riding (over the last 20 years or so) has been on mountain bikes with round rings.</p>
<p>So, I&#8217;m not sure whether my knee is tweaked because I rode further than I&#8217;m used to, because I was too lazy to spin properly for the last 30 miles, because my cleat position was a bit off, because my shoes are too flexible and a tad too small, because I have genetically bad knees, or because of the evils of Biopace. All of these are likely contributing factors.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m a Biopace agnostic.</p>
<p>What I take exception to is your assessment of the Titanic. Having written a thesis on the damaged stability of ships for my Naval Architecture degree (albeit some 15 years ago), I&#8217;m better qualified in this field than I am in egg-shaped chain rings.</p>
<p>The Titanic was the first ship designed to even consider surviving a ruptured hull. Prior to that, it was a certainty &#8211; if you put a hole in the side, the ship was going to the bottom of the ocean unless you could pump the water out faster than it came in.</p>
<p>The Titanic raised the bar, and introduced the design philosophy that is still in use today. They divided the hull into watertight compartments, such that the ship would stay afloat with any _two_ compartments punctured. A quantum leap in thinking.</p>
<p>&#8220;Unsinkable&#8221; was all puff. Made up by the marketeering department, for use by the magazine editors of the day. It would certainly sink if three compartments flooded. They holed five (or six, depending on source).</p>
<p>Nearly 100 years later, we understand the fracture mechanics of cold steel better, and we&#8217;re better able to calculate the survivability of damaged vessels. So we do. </p>
<p>Current design rules take into account the stability of every possible flooding combination and the probability of damage causing that damage state. Compartments are optimised based on these results. If they had attempted such calculations (by hand) when designing Titanic, they&#8217;d still be working today.</p>
<p>Titanic sank because it hit an iceberg, not because it was a badly designed vessel. Any other ship afloat at the time would have sunk. It was the safest ship of its day, and it insults the designers to compare it with Biopace chainrings.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jacob</title>
		<link>http://www.chuffle.com/20070620/biopace-chainrings/comment-page-1#comment-10087</link>
		<dc:creator>Jacob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Dec 2009 05:29:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chuffle.com/20070620/biopace-chainrings/#comment-10087</guid>
		<description>Hey, I have only been cycling for 3 years. Prior to that, I did MTB and BMX. 

I ride a Cannondale SR400, its ok pretty solid. As I am new to cycling and live in Tucson the roads suck. So I am on Mavic Open pros , and currently doing research about Bio-Pace. 

I ride on the shimano biopace. At first I had absolutely no idea what it was. It wasn&#039;t until people started pointing it out that I noticed it. I have heard stuff from; it is horrible, and why do I ride on it, and also from some old cyclists saying they work great. 

After close to ONLY one year of riding on the bio pace, I have not experienced any knee problems of any sort ( Which I understand I have only been riding it for one year; not long enough to clearly say that), I did the Tour De Tucson last month on it, and I have also put on over 500 miles on the crank alone.  When I did the tour (I only did the 66 mile because I had a broken hand in a cast) I placed 148 out of 1225 riders and averaged at 18.1 mph. It was my first tour, and I was pretty pleased with my placings. One thing I noticed, is going up hill, I was absolutely demolishing people. It happened every down stroke, I would literally jump ahead with each stroke. 

Now all that being said this obviously does not support one side or the other. This is simply my experience so far with my bio pace crank. Now I absolutely love it, and I look for it every where. Honestly, when I go into bike shops and ask for used bio, they laugh at me, and tell me how bad it is. I ALWAYS in return ask if they have ever ridden it. I typically get the same reply. No, or my friend once had one. 

As far as this debate goes as I am still trying to come to a conclusion of all this. But honestly Jarvitron, reading your posts has made me question this further. Why is it some people get so heated about the bio pace? Its a fucking crank on my bike? if you don&#039;t like it, thats fine. I don&#039;t like rings now, and I can clearly distinguish the difference. But thats not going to make me go on the internet and start a web fight (&#039;debate&#039; as you called it) about this topic. Now if you wanted to inform me this is horrible for my legs and that I really shouldn&#039;t be riding it. I could take that and reconsider everything. But with your arguments of  ;

&quot;I used to suspect that all the supporters of Biopace are self obsessed
dickbags who write passive aggressive comments on blog posts&quot;

I really can&#039;t take you seriously at all.  Who is the self obsessed all knowing dick bag now on this blog post?


Yes I am trying to get to the bottom of this bio-pace debate, even if that means reading through stupid comment pages and having to see people like you post on these. 

Why is it you hate bio pace so much? I could see if you we&#039;re stuck riding it or something and it just pissed you the fuck off. But shit, get over it dude. 

Jarvitron, if you do reply to my post. I hope the response is not something along the lines of you wanting me to eat corn out of your ass, with my penis cheese. Or whatever the fuck you would consider some one like me, a (SO FAR) supporter of bio pace, actually taking opinions of wether I should be riding it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey, I have only been cycling for 3 years. Prior to that, I did MTB and BMX. </p>
<p>I ride a Cannondale SR400, its ok pretty solid. As I am new to cycling and live in Tucson the roads suck. So I am on Mavic Open pros , and currently doing research about Bio-Pace. </p>
<p>I ride on the shimano biopace. At first I had absolutely no idea what it was. It wasn&#8217;t until people started pointing it out that I noticed it. I have heard stuff from; it is horrible, and why do I ride on it, and also from some old cyclists saying they work great. </p>
<p>After close to ONLY one year of riding on the bio pace, I have not experienced any knee problems of any sort ( Which I understand I have only been riding it for one year; not long enough to clearly say that), I did the Tour De Tucson last month on it, and I have also put on over 500 miles on the crank alone.  When I did the tour (I only did the 66 mile because I had a broken hand in a cast) I placed 148 out of 1225 riders and averaged at 18.1 mph. It was my first tour, and I was pretty pleased with my placings. One thing I noticed, is going up hill, I was absolutely demolishing people. It happened every down stroke, I would literally jump ahead with each stroke. </p>
<p>Now all that being said this obviously does not support one side or the other. This is simply my experience so far with my bio pace crank. Now I absolutely love it, and I look for it every where. Honestly, when I go into bike shops and ask for used bio, they laugh at me, and tell me how bad it is. I ALWAYS in return ask if they have ever ridden it. I typically get the same reply. No, or my friend once had one. </p>
<p>As far as this debate goes as I am still trying to come to a conclusion of all this. But honestly Jarvitron, reading your posts has made me question this further. Why is it some people get so heated about the bio pace? Its a fucking crank on my bike? if you don&#8217;t like it, thats fine. I don&#8217;t like rings now, and I can clearly distinguish the difference. But thats not going to make me go on the internet and start a web fight (&#8216;debate&#8217; as you called it) about this topic. Now if you wanted to inform me this is horrible for my legs and that I really shouldn&#8217;t be riding it. I could take that and reconsider everything. But with your arguments of  ;</p>
<p>&#8220;I used to suspect that all the supporters of Biopace are self obsessed<br />
dickbags who write passive aggressive comments on blog posts&#8221;</p>
<p>I really can&#8217;t take you seriously at all.  Who is the self obsessed all knowing dick bag now on this blog post?</p>
<p>Yes I am trying to get to the bottom of this bio-pace debate, even if that means reading through stupid comment pages and having to see people like you post on these. </p>
<p>Why is it you hate bio pace so much? I could see if you we&#8217;re stuck riding it or something and it just pissed you the fuck off. But shit, get over it dude. </p>
<p>Jarvitron, if you do reply to my post. I hope the response is not something along the lines of you wanting me to eat corn out of your ass, with my penis cheese. Or whatever the fuck you would consider some one like me, a (SO FAR) supporter of bio pace, actually taking opinions of wether I should be riding it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jarvitron</title>
		<link>http://www.chuffle.com/20070620/biopace-chainrings/comment-page-1#comment-9812</link>
		<dc:creator>Jarvitron</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Dec 2009 15:40:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chuffle.com/20070620/biopace-chainrings/#comment-9812</guid>
		<description>Pretty sure I addressed this in an earlier comment but I&#039;ll reiterate for those of you who are slow: &quot;Eat the corn out of my shit you cycling gadget addicted penis cheese&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Pretty sure I addressed this in an earlier comment but I&#8217;ll reiterate for those of you who are slow: &#8220;Eat the corn out of my shit you cycling gadget addicted penis cheese&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: asonetuh</title>
		<link>http://www.chuffle.com/20070620/biopace-chainrings/comment-page-1#comment-9802</link>
		<dc:creator>asonetuh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Dec 2009 20:26:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chuffle.com/20070620/biopace-chainrings/#comment-9802</guid>
		<description>&gt;&gt;Just because something has become standard while alternatives flounder doesn&#039;t make it better… just more popular.

see: Dvorak</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&gt;&gt;Just because something has become standard while alternatives flounder doesn&#8217;t make it better… just more popular.</p>
<p>see: Dvorak</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jarvitron</title>
		<link>http://www.chuffle.com/20070620/biopace-chainrings/comment-page-1#comment-9612</link>
		<dc:creator>Jarvitron</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 00:21:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chuffle.com/20070620/biopace-chainrings/#comment-9612</guid>
		<description>Fuck you cunt. Sheldon doesn&#039;t get special treatment just because he died a year after I wrote this article. And it&#039;s not like SB invented biopace you mealy mouthed debate club reject, he&#039;s just another gimmick tech follower who happened to have an encyclopedic memory. God bless him and all his contributions and all, but he liked him some backwards ass technology. And my name and face is associated with my blog everywhere. My name is Aaron Walker, I live in Portland fucking Oregon, and I proudly stand by a post I wrote in 2007 about a technology that for the most part died in 1994, despite the two year long crusade by wannabe hero worshiping apologists whose mommas should have simply let run down into the ass crack instead of scooping them back in. Get fucked forever biopace hero! I hope that Christ holds and keeps you in His Kingdom Eternal.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fuck you cunt. Sheldon doesn&#8217;t get special treatment just because he died a year after I wrote this article. And it&#8217;s not like SB invented biopace you mealy mouthed debate club reject, he&#8217;s just another gimmick tech follower who happened to have an encyclopedic memory. God bless him and all his contributions and all, but he liked him some backwards ass technology. And my name and face is associated with my blog everywhere. My name is Aaron Walker, I live in Portland fucking Oregon, and I proudly stand by a post I wrote in 2007 about a technology that for the most part died in 1994, despite the two year long crusade by wannabe hero worshiping apologists whose mommas should have simply let run down into the ass crack instead of scooping them back in. Get fucked forever biopace hero! I hope that Christ holds and keeps you in His Kingdom Eternal.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Thomas</title>
		<link>http://www.chuffle.com/20070620/biopace-chainrings/comment-page-1#comment-9610</link>
		<dc:creator>Thomas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2009 23:28:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chuffle.com/20070620/biopace-chainrings/#comment-9610</guid>
		<description>Your argument against Biopace lack specifics on why you thought it was a bad design:

&quot;Officially disavowed by the people who made it: Oh really?&quot; - Show me the links. 
&quot;Universally accepted as failures.&quot; - ORLY? 
&quot;Moderate fowardthink without any real analysis.&quot; - What&#039;s your analysis revealed there Einstein?
&quot;Maths without fizzix.&quot; - Way to get all ghetto, again, no substance.

On top of that, you insulted and got a response from Sheldon Brown, a true saint to the cycling industry. God rest his soul, it&#039;s great that he didn&#039;t take you too seriously, but I triple dog dare you to put your real name and face on senseless opinions like that. It&#039;s like insulting Mother Teresa&#039;s peace efforts. &quot;Wah wah wah, Biopace sucked!&quot; Truly groundbreaking work, jackass.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Your argument against Biopace lack specifics on why you thought it was a bad design:</p>
<p>&#8220;Officially disavowed by the people who made it: Oh really?&#8221; &#8211; Show me the links.<br />
&#8220;Universally accepted as failures.&#8221; &#8211; ORLY?<br />
&#8220;Moderate fowardthink without any real analysis.&#8221; &#8211; What&#8217;s your analysis revealed there Einstein?<br />
&#8220;Maths without fizzix.&#8221; &#8211; Way to get all ghetto, again, no substance.</p>
<p>On top of that, you insulted and got a response from Sheldon Brown, a true saint to the cycling industry. God rest his soul, it&#8217;s great that he didn&#8217;t take you too seriously, but I triple dog dare you to put your real name and face on senseless opinions like that. It&#8217;s like insulting Mother Teresa&#8217;s peace efforts. &#8220;Wah wah wah, Biopace sucked!&#8221; Truly groundbreaking work, jackass.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
